SCReader

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Williams

POSSIBLE NON-MERITS OPINION
214 U.S. 492April 27, 19091909
Switch between the majority/per curiam opinion and concurrences/dissents when available.
Per Curiam:

In the opinión of a majority of the court this certificate is essentially the same as that disposed of in Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company v. Williams, 205 U. S. 444, and it is therefore dismissed on the authority of that decision.

Tip: “Raw” is for testing CourtListener variability. For production we will sanitize HTML and/or render normalized blocks.